fredag den 25. april 2014

Book Review: The Phoenix Project: A Novel About IT, DevOps , and Helping Your Business Win

First published in danish here

I would like to recommend you a book on IT operations . It is written as a novel, but contains significant learning points and academic elements that are relevant. The book is written in an attractive and readable language, with many all-action sections where IT operations often are compared to war-like situations or American action movies. I have several times been thinking my time in the military, when the authors are talking about crashes in IT systems. For example, the IT operations chief speaks to his section leaders on a massive crash in the payroll system and then a crash in the SAN:

 

 First, the events that led to the SAN and payroll failure on Thuesday may not happen again. What started off as a medium-sized payroll failure snowballed into a massive friendly-fire SAN incident. “ s. 78.  

 

 One is tempted to shout hell yea - Oorah . (Expression from the Marines) when reading these passages in the book.

 

At the same time I often find myself smiling of recognizable elements in the small incidents portrayed in the book. These episodes are easy to relate to from my own time in an IT operations organization. This makes the book relevant and funny in its own light consenting shape.

 The book starts with the main character Bill Palmer being promoted two levels in the IT department of a large manufacturing company that produces car parts. Bill is a former Marine and a sergeant and hence the book's explicit big hero. He goes from being head of section in a smaller section with 6 employees to become Head of the entire IT operation. Meanwhile, a number of large business critical projects are delayed - especially the Phoenix project (part of the title of the book), which is a 2 -year delay, 20 million dollars big project to reverse the decline of the Company Bill is employed in. In addition, IT operations in the enterprise are characterized by their daily effort to fix a large number of issues and they have no overview of what the employees actually spend their time on.

The book's major theme is described fairly accurately on page 53 where Bill Palmer himself describes the issues that the IT department faces. The following may also be well regarded in a general perspective on the industry, and therefore the book's messages are often relevant and recognizable.

The plot is simple: First, you take an urgent date-driven project, where the shipment date cannot be delayed because of external commitments made to Wall Street or customers. Then you add a bunch of developers who use up all the time in the schedule, leaving no time for testing or operations deployment. And because no one is willing to slip the deployment date, everyone after Development has to take outrageous and unacceptable shortcuts to hit the date.

The results are never pretty. Usually, the software product is so unstable and unusable that even the people who were screaming for it end up saying that it’s not worth shipping. And it’s always IT Operations who still has to stay up all night, rebooting servers hourly to compensate for crappy code, doing whatever heroics are required to hide from the rest of the world just how bad things really are.( s.53)


Bill Palmer and his two section leaders are in the first part of the book thrown in one big IT crash after another, an external security audit and several issues that only a few of their employees  can solve (bottlenecks ) . After those issues Bill Palmer meets Eric Reid who has previously worked in the production at one of the factories and has now been offered a seat on the board. Erik Reid is Bill Palmer's savior and he introduces a number of tools that Bill can use to get a handle on his organization and production. Erik explains his method in a sort of hippie / Buddhism kind of way:

”The First Way helps us understand how to create fast flow of work as it moves from Development into IT Operations, because that's what's between the business and the customer. The Second Way shows us how to shorten and amplify feedback loops, so we can fix quality at the source and avoid rework. And the Third Way shows us how to create a culture that simultaneously fosters experimentation, learning from failure, and understanding that repetition and practice are the prerequisites to mastery." S. 91

Bill Palmer works subsequent to correct the IT department, aligns IT with business, ensure good and u bureaucratic processes and distribute work equally among the employees. He tries to identify and address bottlenecks and minimize unplanned work (read emergency breakdowns and project tasks) , to work in a structured , strategic and coherent end-to -end process. All the walls eventually are patched with Kanban boards and LEAN concepts are flying freely through the air. All very nice when he succeeds, but the portrayal of the book seems a little saved, and almost too easily managed and to happy.

The book is also a little archetypal in its character sketches. Bill our biggest hero, Patty is a change manager who love (long and complex) procedures, Wes is operationsmanager with everything that belongs to the subject. He yells before thinking it through , he 's a little overweight and loves technology more than people , John is the IT Security Officer and Bren 's IT nerd , magician , WizKid or some sort of Yoda doing everything in the IT department. Virtually nothing work in the IT department at the beginning of the book, and it cannot be fixed without Brent helps. When Brent works, he goes like in a trance-like state, manipulate code in an intuitive and incomprehensible way. (“You do not need to see his identification ... These are not the droids you're looking for ...).

In other passages in the book, the person depictions is little archetypal and ordinary, but that makes them on the other hand very recognizable from the real world. It is partly amusing but also instructive in terms of how to get people with different backgrounds and perspectives to work together.

Implementation of Eric Reid's three ways runs more smoothly in the book than it probably would in reality. There's just nothing that is that bad and that rapidly becoming well. But if you can ignore this, then the content of the book is still relevant. The book does not deal with human or cultural elements of such major changes, which is probably a major gap.

I think the book is excellent and I would recommend it to everyone in the IT industry. The book also provides an accessible insight into the engine room of an IT department, and illustrates the importance of getting an IT strategy, prioritization of IT projects and the selection of projects coordinated and consolidated with the business vision and goals.

On this basis alone, the book should be read by managers, department and section managers and development staff in companies, which are all dependent on IT to achieve their business goals.

The Phoenix Project: A Novel About IT, DevOps , and Helping Your Business Win
All page references are based on the Kindle version with an upright angle.

torsdag den 10. april 2014

Videoclip: Nyt OUH and SDU meets the users of the New University Hospital

Yesterday Syddansk Universitet and Nyt OUH invited interested citizens to look and hear about our great and huge project. It was a great success and people had a lot of question to their future hospital, future neighbour and future workplace. Below are links to some media clips about the meeting (in Danish).








mandag den 7. april 2014

Book review: Enterprise Architecture As Strategy

Was first published in danish here

I have previously written about the IT industry as a place were empty words and promises lives well, and it is not entirely wrong. But when you are in an evidence-based health system, as I am, so will half intelligent methods/model and as we say in Denmark, sometimes long-haired solutions not supported by either the boardroom or among clinicians, not result in praise. Clinicians require evidence , and if they does not, then it might be because clinical practice has not been changed, we still deliver healthcare as we always have done and then there is no clinical effect. Power to paper and nothing more.  So it is only when the clinicians want to discuss the change of healthcare, our IT system is having an effect.  But then I bought the book :

 Enterprise Architecture As strategy , Creating a Foundation for Business Execution (2006 )

where recommendations and conclusions are based on 15 years of study ( started in 1995) , and more than 200 companies participated , so perhaps there is something conclusive and robust in this book's recommendations . This makes it, if nothing else, extremely interesting in a IT contexts , as this kind of thoroughness is not seen often in our line of work.

 The book I have read in the summer and it's about enterprise architecture . Not as a technical discipline, but as a managerial approach to strategy development. The book was written in 2006 by Jeanne W. Ross ( Principal Research Scientist. MIT ), Peter Weil ( director of CISR and MIT Sloan Senior Research Scientist ) and David C. Robertson ( Professor to IMD International).

The book describes how a company (hospital) create their Foundation for Business Execution . So a company's ability to execute / implement its key processes in a qualitatively high and reliable level . For this to happen, Ross, Weil and Robertson identifies three main areas a company must go through. You have to define and work with the following :
  •     Operating Model (OM)
  •     Enterprise Architecture (EA)
  •     IT engagement model
Operating model is defined as : " ...the necessary level of business process integration and standardization for delivering goods and services to customers” (s. 8).. In other words, OM reflects the vision and strategy as a company's top management has decided . The claim in the book is that OM will influence and thus provide a framework and direction for prioritizing IT efforts in the future.

 Enterprise Architecture (EA ) is defined as : "The organizing logic for business processes and IT infrastructure reflecting the integration and standardization requirements of the company’s operating model (p. 47). EA should describe the relationship between the key processes in a company with systems and data. The two areas IT and business are closely related , and the authors of the book emphasizes the importance of the IT solutions support business strategy. To facilitate the understanding of EA work they introduce a so-called core diagram representing an overall view of the architecture , with key processes, systems and data that support the selected Operation Model is shown.

 IT engagement model is defined as : "” the system of governance mechanisms assuring that business and It projects achieve both local and company-wide objectives” (s. 118-119) . So a system of governance mechanisms , to ensure that projects achieve local and overall business objectives. Are you thinking Benefit Management - well you are not entirely wrong.

 In addition to individual passages in the book that has a, for a Dane, a too straightforward message: " we know best " and " do as we recommend , then it will go well in life ," then the book is well documented and in a language that is fluent and understandable. The book does not bury you deep in technical terms, but focuses on the managerial and strategic planning of IT and EA , as well as how it can be seen in the context of a business strategy . The book is intended for IT managers who are interested in a method that shapes and frames their plan to align IT efforts and architecture , but it will also turn to students as the book's theoretical underpinnings are solid and well documented.

 I would like to recommend the book, and with its 234 pages, it is a fast read for most people. I think it gives a breath of fresh air , introduce new ways and is probably close to something we in the IT industry , will  call evidence-based . If nothing then only for that reason. Read the book - We owe it to patients, families and especially clinicians. The services and systems IT delivers , should at least be as evidence-based as those services our clinic supplies.

 Enterprise Architecture as Strategy : Creating a Foundation for Business Execution Jeanne W. Ross, Peter Weill , and David Robertson, 2006 , Harvard Business School Press